Mike - another five-star hit. Thanks for the great explanation on"peer reviewed papers" and the inevitable fallout when authors disagree. Somewhere in the dim and dusty past, Peter Attia had a blogpost with the number of scientific papers published daily in this country - but of course, could I find it now? It was, in any event, a stagge…
Mike - another five-star hit. Thanks for the great explanation on"peer reviewed papers" and the inevitable fallout when authors disagree. Somewhere in the dim and dusty past, Peter Attia had a blogpost with the number of scientific papers published daily in this country - but of course, could I find it now? It was, in any event, a staggering amount, and most of them are never replicated. Science, eh? I've also recently read that the information published in the Times (NY) and the Wall Street Journal on the minimal adverse effects of the jabs was what one author called a "limited hangout," which I had to look up, but I'm sure you understand. Very interesting. Wonder what they're all covering up. The "too much protein" "study" really grinds my gears. It's a constant barrage everywhere against protein in the press and even in the entertainment industry (I"m thinking about movies on Netflix). On a recent menu I was checking you could click on your dietary needs - things like gluten free, etc. One of the options to click on was "no red meat." Talk about virtue signaling. It's a crab place in Florida, for what it's worth and the seafood looks amazing, but why pick on red meat? There's only a burger on the whole menu.
Just a couple (that I saw - I miss 'em too, dammit.)
another professor from somewhere wrote and article
wrote an article
Tsimane, indigenous Ameriandians of Amazonian Bolivia
I think the spelling should be Amerindians
(The term Amerindian, a portmanteau of "American Indian")
I'm glad you brought up the term "limited hangout." I didn't know what it was, either, so I looked it up. Obviously a commonly used technique. Thanks for the heads up.
The universe run by the elites (read: lefties) is down, down, down on red meat consumption. So I expect to see it badmouthed everywhere. Including in the study I dissected.
Thanks for finding the typos. All fixed except for the Ameriandians, which was in a quote from the paper, so I left it alone. When I read it in the paper, I assumed it was a portmanteau word combining America (as in South America), the Andes, and Indian. Thus Ameri And Ians. But it could also be a misprint.
Mike - another five-star hit. Thanks for the great explanation on"peer reviewed papers" and the inevitable fallout when authors disagree. Somewhere in the dim and dusty past, Peter Attia had a blogpost with the number of scientific papers published daily in this country - but of course, could I find it now? It was, in any event, a staggering amount, and most of them are never replicated. Science, eh? I've also recently read that the information published in the Times (NY) and the Wall Street Journal on the minimal adverse effects of the jabs was what one author called a "limited hangout," which I had to look up, but I'm sure you understand. Very interesting. Wonder what they're all covering up. The "too much protein" "study" really grinds my gears. It's a constant barrage everywhere against protein in the press and even in the entertainment industry (I"m thinking about movies on Netflix). On a recent menu I was checking you could click on your dietary needs - things like gluten free, etc. One of the options to click on was "no red meat." Talk about virtue signaling. It's a crab place in Florida, for what it's worth and the seafood looks amazing, but why pick on red meat? There's only a burger on the whole menu.
Just a couple (that I saw - I miss 'em too, dammit.)
another professor from somewhere wrote and article
wrote an article
Tsimane, indigenous Ameriandians of Amazonian Bolivia
I think the spelling should be Amerindians
(The term Amerindian, a portmanteau of "American Indian")
I'm glad you brought up the term "limited hangout." I didn't know what it was, either, so I looked it up. Obviously a commonly used technique. Thanks for the heads up.
The universe run by the elites (read: lefties) is down, down, down on red meat consumption. So I expect to see it badmouthed everywhere. Including in the study I dissected.
Thanks for finding the typos. All fixed except for the Ameriandians, which was in a quote from the paper, so I left it alone. When I read it in the paper, I assumed it was a portmanteau word combining America (as in South America), the Andes, and Indian. Thus Ameri And Ians. But it could also be a misprint.