Dr. Eades: You are definitely on to something regarding the issue of climate change. It appears that there are few, if any, modern day issues in society that cannot be laid at the feet of climate change, In reality, we know very little about what's actually happening. And in the context of Jason Crawfords article on science, there is ver…
Dr. Eades: You are definitely on to something regarding the issue of climate change. It appears that there are few, if any, modern day issues in society that cannot be laid at the feet of climate change, In reality, we know very little about what's actually happening. And in the context of Jason Crawfords article on science, there is very little actual scientific inquiry occurring, For example, none of these questions can be answered:
1. Why throughout history is there no correlation between atmospheric CO2 and global temperature?
2. What amount of the (questionable?) rise in global temperature that is being alleged is anthropengic versus the result of natural phenomena
3. Why is the Great Barrier Reef coral growing?
4. Why is the effect of atmospheric H2O and clouds not considered a driver of global temperature when it is a more significant green house gas than CO2?
5. Why does actual NOAA and NASA global ocean and atmospheric data not reported by the media? Could it be because this raw data does not show any warming trends,?
6 What are the benefits of increasing CO2 in the atmosphere?
7. How much of sea level rise being measured in various locations is the result of tectconic or local land subsidence issues as opposed to sea level rises purported from loss of glaciers?
These are just a few--there are many more. Alarmists sceintitst are the Big Pharma of this issue?
I agree. I love what Matt Briggs writes about climate change. Not only is he a major statistician, he is a climatologist as well. https://wmbriggs.substack.com/
There is a ton of money to be made in the whole climate change arena. Politicians shovel money to various "green" energy companies, many of which they own a piece of the action. Which is why most politicians get rich over their years in office despite receiving fairly meager salaries. Find me people in any private industry who make $164,000 per year and retire will millions after 6-8 years. It's not just "green" energy that makes them rich, that's just what's in vogue among the group currently in power.
Dr. Eades: You are definitely on to something regarding the issue of climate change. It appears that there are few, if any, modern day issues in society that cannot be laid at the feet of climate change, In reality, we know very little about what's actually happening. And in the context of Jason Crawfords article on science, there is very little actual scientific inquiry occurring, For example, none of these questions can be answered:
1. Why throughout history is there no correlation between atmospheric CO2 and global temperature?
2. What amount of the (questionable?) rise in global temperature that is being alleged is anthropengic versus the result of natural phenomena
3. Why is the Great Barrier Reef coral growing?
4. Why is the effect of atmospheric H2O and clouds not considered a driver of global temperature when it is a more significant green house gas than CO2?
5. Why does actual NOAA and NASA global ocean and atmospheric data not reported by the media? Could it be because this raw data does not show any warming trends,?
6 What are the benefits of increasing CO2 in the atmosphere?
7. How much of sea level rise being measured in various locations is the result of tectconic or local land subsidence issues as opposed to sea level rises purported from loss of glaciers?
These are just a few--there are many more. Alarmists sceintitst are the Big Pharma of this issue?
I agree. I love what Matt Briggs writes about climate change. Not only is he a major statistician, he is a climatologist as well. https://wmbriggs.substack.com/
There is a ton of money to be made in the whole climate change arena. Politicians shovel money to various "green" energy companies, many of which they own a piece of the action. Which is why most politicians get rich over their years in office despite receiving fairly meager salaries. Find me people in any private industry who make $164,000 per year and retire will millions after 6-8 years. It's not just "green" energy that makes them rich, that's just what's in vogue among the group currently in power.