I consider that study to be an ideational vaccine. Given that the paper identifies a risk of 40% for dementia 'associated' with D insufficiency, I do get the idea - get some D. With sugar I realize I should do without it. These mental vaccinations' only side effect tends to be health? A way to survive in a milieu of collapsing medical au…
I consider that study to be an ideational vaccine. Given that the paper identifies a risk of 40% for dementia 'associated' with D insufficiency, I do get the idea - get some D. With sugar I realize I should do without it. These mental vaccinations' only side effect tends to be health? A way to survive in a milieu of collapsing medical authorities, yet rising AI that supplants authority with AGI as a lifetime resource?
I consider that study to be an ideational vaccine. Given that the paper identifies a risk of 40% for dementia 'associated' with D insufficiency, I do get the idea - get some D. With sugar I realize I should do without it. These mental vaccinations' only side effect tends to be health? A way to survive in a milieu of collapsing medical authorities, yet rising AI that supplants authority with AGI as a lifetime resource?