Agree, but this might be related to the fact that the company owns so many brands now. People can stop buying the brand only to switch to another brand owned by the same company. So while the brand suffers in the short terms, the company continues to do well. Your points of course are entirely valid, and it is nice to see the culture rej…
Agree, but this might be related to the fact that the company owns so many brands now. People can stop buying the brand only to switch to another brand owned by the same company. So while the brand suffers in the short terms, the company continues to do well. Your points of course are entirely valid, and it is nice to see the culture reject this kind of brand ESG. However, the point of my comment is that what looks like a minor victory in the Culture Wars may well be a Pyrrhic one, or an illusory one.
Agree, but this might be related to the fact that the company owns so many brands now. People can stop buying the brand only to switch to another brand owned by the same company. So while the brand suffers in the short terms, the company continues to do well. Your points of course are entirely valid, and it is nice to see the culture reject this kind of brand ESG. However, the point of my comment is that what looks like a minor victory in the Culture Wars may well be a Pyrrhic one, or an illusory one.